High Court Bars Telcos From Reassigning Phone Numbers
In a judgment issued on Thursday, March 19, Justice Lawrence Mugambi ruled that mobile numbers serve as digital identifiers linking a wide range of personal information to an individual’s private life, and therefore fall under constitutional privacy protections.
“Registered mobile phone numbers constitute personal data protected under the Constitution and cannot be arbitrarily reassigned without the owner’s consent,” the judge held.

Constitutional Right to Privacy
In his decision, Justice Mugambi cited Articles 31 (c) and (d) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, which guarantee every person the right to privacy, including protection from unnecessary disclosure of personal information.
“Mobile numbers are digital identifiers that connect financial, social, and personal activities to an individual’s private affairs,” Mugambi observed.
Because of this interconnected role, the court found that reassigning a number previously tied to someone else could expose sensitive data to third parties, potentially enabling identity theft, fraud, or unauthorised access to private accounts.
Petition Challenging Number Recycling
The ruling stemmed from a petition filed in June 2024 seeking to stop telecommunication companies from recycling numbers that had been deactivated due to inactivity.
Petitioners argued that such practices posed a significant threat to privacy because previously registered numbers often remain linked to personal records long after they fall out of use.
They warned that reassignment could allow new users to receive confidential messages, account alerts, or verification codes intended for the original owner.
Concerns Over Vulnerable Groups
The court acknowledged these concerns, emphasising that privacy protections must extend to all citizens regardless of circumstances.

Strict Conditions for Any Reassignment
While not imposing an absolute ban on number recycling, the High Court set stringent conditions that must be met before any reassignment can occur.
“Reassignment of a mobile number should only occur under strict conditions designed to protect the privacy of the previous owner,” the judgment stated.
Among the requirements outlined by the court are:
- The previous owner’s informed and verifiable consent
- A reasonable waiting period
- Public notice of the intended reassignment
- Documented efforts to contact the original owner
- Confirmation that the owner has relinquished rights to the number
Additionally, telecommunications firms must implement technical safeguards to prevent exposure or transfer of personal data associated with the former user.
Directive to Government
Legal analysts say the decision could have far-reaching implications for telecommunications regulation, data protection, and digital security practices in Kenya.
Impact on Consumers and Industry
Privacy advocates have welcomed the decision as a major step toward recognising digital identity rights, while industry players are expected to review policies on number deactivation and reassignment to ensure compliance.

For millions of mobile users, the ruling offers reassurance that losing a phone line will no longer automatically mean losing control over the personal information tied to it.
ALSO READ: Gladys Wanga Dismisses Sifuna-Linked Parallel ODM NDC, Terms It Plot to Mislead Members
High Court Bars Telcos From Reassigning Phone Numbers

