The proposed Career Management Policy seeks to change how public officers plan and develop their careers by introducing several pathways through which employees can advance within government institutions.
Vertical progression would allow an employee to move to a higher grade, while horizontal movement could involve transferring to another department while remaining at the same level. Diagonal progression would allow officers to move to higher responsibilities in a different area of the public service.
“The proposed policy provides for greater career mobility through vertical, horizontal and diagonal movement.”
“It also introduces dual career paths for technical and professional cadres, allowing highly skilled public officers to progress either through managerial positions or specialist and expert pathways,” the PSC stated.
The commission said the proposed approach would give civil servants greater flexibility while reducing the pressure on highly skilled officers to move into management simply to advance their careers.
The framework seeks to connect career management with other human resource practices, including performance management, training and professional development.
“Once implemented, the policy is expected to mainstream best practices in human resource management, including career planning, career pathing and career development,” Meja said.
“It will also strengthen linkages with other human resource practices, prioritise resources for career management and broaden employee development to include coaching and mentorship,” Meja added.
PSC Chairperson Francis Meja addresses directors of human resource management during a training workshop in Naivasha on Thursday, August 6, 2026.
The approach is similar to reforms being considered in other public institutions, including the Teachers Service Commission (TSC), which has been reviewing career progression arrangements for teachers.
Public Participation Underway
The PSC outlined the proposed changes after conducting a stakeholder feedback workshop as part of efforts to develop the new policy.
Stakeholders are expected to examine the feedback, identify areas that require further clarification and address outstanding concerns before the policy is finalised.
The process is expected to determine how the proposed career pathways will be implemented across different public service cadres.