FIDA Denies Calling for Probe Into Gachagua Over University Student’s Murder
The Federation of Women Lawyers Kenya has distanced itself from a widely circulated statement on social media that purports to link former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua to the alleged killing of a university student, terming the document fabricated and misleading.
In an official clarification, the women’s rights organisation said it did not author, endorse, or distribute the statement, which calls for a criminal investigation into the death of a student identified as criminal investigation and names Gachagua as a person of interest.
Fake Statement Sparks Online Frenzy
The falsified document, which spread rapidly across digital platforms, claims that FIDA-Kenya was demanding immediate action from law enforcement authorities following allegations surrounding the student’s death. It also references purported remarks attributed to William Ruto and accusations allegedly made by Martha Miano, suggesting a connection between the former deputy president and the circumstances of Wairimu’s death.
None of these claims have been independently verified, and no official investigation linking Gachagua to the incident has been publicly confirmed by authorities.
Organisation Disowns the Document
“We urge the public to disregard it and remain vigilant against impersonation and misuse of our name,” the organisation said in a notice posted on its official communication channels.
The group emphasised that it had no involvement whatsoever in drafting or releasing the document, describing it as a malicious attempt to exploit its reputation to lend credibility to unverified allegations.
Concern Over Disinformation
The incident has renewed concerns about the growing spread of false information online, particularly on politically sensitive issues. Civil society observers note that fabricated statements attributed to respected organisations can easily influence public perception and escalate tensions.
FIDA-Kenya’s leadership underscored that such misuse of institutional names undermines public trust and diverts attention from genuine advocacy work on issues such as gender justice, legal aid, and human rights.
Calls for Responsible Sharing
Digital safety experts have urged the public to verify information through official sources before sharing potentially damaging claims. They warn that forwarding unverified content can amplify misinformation and harm individuals as well as institutions.
In Kenya, several agencies—including the Directorate of Criminal Investigations—have previously cautioned against the spread of false reports that could incite panic or defamation.
Political Sensitivity of the Case
Gachagua, who has remained an influential figure in national politics since leaving office, has not issued a public response to the fake statement as of the latest reports.
Implications for Public Trust
The episode highlights the broader challenge facing institutions in the digital age: protecting their credibility against impersonation and misinformation. Advocacy groups say repeated misuse of their names could weaken their ability to mobilise support for legitimate causes.
FIDA-Kenya reiterated its commitment to factual, evidence-based advocacy and urged authorities to investigate any criminal matters through proper legal channels rather than relying on social media speculation.
As the story continues to unfold, observers stress that verified information from official investigators will be crucial in establishing the facts surrounding the student’s death—and in countering the tide of misinformation that has already spread widely online.
ALSO READ: World Bank Bars Kenyan Firms for 21 Months in Ksh149.8 Billion Fraud Case
FIDA Denies Calling for Probe Into Gachagua Over University Student’s Murder
