Court of Appeal Overturns 2022 Abortion Ruling, Says Abortion Not a Fundamental Right
In a judgment delivered in Malindi on Friday, April 24, a three-judge bench comprising Gatembu Kairu, Kibaya Laibuta, and Grace Ngenye ruled that abortion is not a fundamental right under the Constitution of Kenya.
The appellate court clarified that termination of pregnancy remains illegal except under narrowly defined circumstances provided for in law. Specifically, the court noted that abortion may only be permitted where a qualified medical practitioner determines that there is a serious risk to the life or health of the expectant mother.

“In effect, abortion is not a fundamental right guaranteed under the Constitution,” the judges stated in their ruling.
The decision followed consolidated appeals filed by the State and other parties challenging the earlier High Court judgment, which had interpreted constitutional provisions as allowing broader access to safe and legal abortion services.
At the same time, the court emphasised that the Constitution does not impose an absolute ban on abortion but instead allows limited exceptions. These include cases of emergency treatment, where the life or health of the mother is at risk, or where permitted under other written laws.
“Consequently, the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Malindi… are hereby set aside. The proceedings… are reinstated for hearing and determination on their merits,” the bench ruled.
The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for reproductive health policy, legal practice, and access to medical services in Kenya, particularly for women seeking safe abortion care under complex circumstances.

Data from the Ministry of Health Kenya indicates that unsafe abortions remain a significant public health concern. A 2025 report revealed that between 2003 and 2004, an estimated 792,000 induced abortions occurred in the country, translating to 57.3 cases per 1,000 women aged between 15 and 49 years.
The report further indicated that a large proportion of those who sought such services were married or in stable relationships, with many having previously given birth. Health experts have often linked these figures to gaps in access to reproductive health services, family planning, and education.
The ruling is likely to reignite debate among policymakers, civil society organisations, and healthcare professionals over how to balance legal frameworks with public health considerations.

As the reinstated cases proceed in lower courts, attention is expected to shift to how the judiciary will interpret and apply the clarified legal standards in practice.
ALSO READ: Jeff Koinange Narrates How Controversial Interview With Miguna Miguna Led Him to Quit KTN
Court of Appeal Overturns 2022 Abortion Ruling, Says Abortion Not a Fundamental Right

