Court Bars Kakamega Governor Barasa From Making Defamatory Remarks Against Woman Rep Muhanda
A simmering political feud in Kakamega County has escalated into a legal battle after a court issued interim orders restraining Governor Fernandes Barasa from making alleged defamatory remarks against Woman Representative Elsie Muhanda Busihile.
The orders, issued on Monday, April 13, mark a significant development in the dispute between the two leaders, effectively barring the governor and individuals associated with him from making or disseminating statements deemed defamatory against the legislator pending the hearing and determination of the case.
According to court documents, the directives extend beyond the governor to include his agents, employees, political allies, and any persons acting under his authority. The ruling follows a defamation suit filed by Muhanda, in which she is seeking Ksh18 million in damages over alleged slander and libel.
“…hereby ordered that the application be served for inter partes mention for directions on 7/5/2026…that orders in terms of prayer 2 do issue in the interim,” read part of the court order, underscoring the temporary but binding nature of the restrictions.
Muhanda moved to court through her lawyer, Danstan Omari, accusing Governor Barasa of making disparaging remarks about her in public forums. The statements, she argues, questioned her competence to hold public office and were calculated to tarnish her image among constituents.
In her filings, the Woman Representative maintains that the remarks were false, malicious, and politically motivated, causing significant reputational harm and emotional distress. “The statements have caused severe damage to my political standing and personal reputation,” she stated in a supporting affidavit.
Beyond financial compensation, Muhanda is also seeking a court order compelling the governor to retract the alleged statements, issue a public apology with equal prominence, and remove any defamatory content already in circulation.
Legal experts note that such interim orders are typically granted to prevent further harm while a case is being heard, particularly in defamation matters where reputational damage can escalate rapidly through public discourse and digital platforms.
The case also carries broader political implications, as it unfolds against the backdrop of rising tensions ahead of the 2027 General Election. Muhanda has publicly expressed interest in contesting the Kakamega gubernatorial seat, a move that could set the stage for a direct political showdown with the incumbent.
The court’s intervention now places legal limits on the nature of public commentary between the two leaders, with potential consequences for non-compliance. Failure to adhere to the orders could expose Governor Barasa to contempt of court proceedings, which carry penalties including fines or other sanctions.
The legal dispute comes in the wake of a tense weekend in Kakamega, where rival factions believed to be aligned with the two leaders clashed during a funeral service in Ikolomani Constituency. The confrontation disrupted the burial ceremony and left at least one individual seriously injured following a stabbing incident.
While Governor Barasa has yet to publicly respond to the court orders, the case is expected to attract significant attention as it proceeds through the judicial system. The matter is scheduled for mention on May 7, 2026, when further directions will be issued by the court.
For now, the ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in mediating political disputes and safeguarding reputations, even as political temperatures continue to rise in the county.
ALSO RAED: Kenyan Graduates Among Those to Benefit From German DAAD Scholarships
Court Bars Kakamega Governor Barasa From Making Defamatory Remarks Against Woman Rep Muhanda
