Interior Ministry Directs NGOs to Re-Register Under New Legal Framework or Risk Deregistration
In a notice released on Monday, May 4, the Ministry warned that organisations yet to comply with the Public Benefit Organisations (PBO) framework must complete the transition within a strict timeline or face deregistration. The directive targets thousands of NGOs currently registered under older laws, signalling a decisive push to enforce updated regulatory standards.
In its official communication, the Ministry stated, “All NGOs that have not yet transitioned to the new Public Benefit Organisations (PBO) Regulations framework are required to review the prescribed requirements and to submit the prescribed information and supporting documentation to facilitate re-registration.” The statement underscores the urgency of compliance as the deadline approaches.
According to the Ministry, the transition period will lapse on May 13, 2026, after which organisations that have not fulfilled the requirements risk being struck off the register and barred from operating within the country. It further warned, “Kindly note that the transition period lapses on May 13, 2026, and all compliance requirements must be fulfilled within this timeframe, with failure affecting the organisation’s legal status.”
The new framework is anchored in the Public Benefit Organisations Act, 2013, a law designed to streamline oversight, improve transparency, and ensure accountability within the non-profit sector. Under the regulations, NGOs will be required to meet stricter operational and reporting standards, including demonstrating that their activities serve the public good.
Organisations that directly implement projects in Kenya must now formally register under the PBO structure, while those that operate indirectly—such as funders and international partners—will be required to obtain permits. Additional obligations include submitting annual reports, audited financial statements, and passing a public benefit test to verify their impact and compliance.
Government officials argue that the reforms are necessary to strengthen governance and eliminate loopholes that have previously allowed irregularities in the sector. The move is also seen as part of broader efforts to align Kenya’s non-profit regulatory environment with international best practices.
However, the directive has not gone unchallenged. A section of NGOs has criticised the requirement for re-registration, arguing that it contradicts earlier legal interpretations regarding the transition process.
One organisation stated, “Re-registration requirement was declared unconstitutional, and all NGOs are expected to transit automatically.” The group further questioned the legality of the platform designated for the process, adding,__ “The eCitizen platform for PBORA is illegal as currently formatted… applicants cannot use forms and fees under the defunct NGOs Coordination Act.”
These objections highlight a growing tension between regulators and civil society organisations, with concerns raised over both the legal basis and practical implementation of the new framework. Some stakeholders have warned that the short timeline could disrupt operations, particularly for smaller organisations that may struggle to meet the documentation requirements within the set period.
Despite the pushback, the government has maintained its position, urging all affected organisations to comply within the stipulated timeframe to avoid interruptions in their work. Officials have emphasised that failure to transition could result in loss of legal recognition, potentially affecting funding, partnerships, and programme delivery.
Reiterating its stance, the Ministry urged, “All NGOs… are required to review the prescribed requirements and submit the necessary documentation to facilitate re-registration and issuance of the appropriate certificate.”
As the May 13 deadline approaches, the directive is expected to have far-reaching implications for Kenya’s non-profit sector, potentially reshaping how organisations operate, report, and engage with both government and communities.
The unfolding developments also raise broader questions about the balance between regulation and operational independence in civil society, as well as the capacity of institutions to enforce reforms without disrupting critical services delivered by NGOs across the country.
ALSO READ: Gachagua Defends Uhuru Amid Threats by Ruto Allies to Withdraw Benefits
Interior Ministry Directs NGOs to Re-Register Under New Legal Framework or Risk Deregistration
